MLA Position Statements and FAQs
Copyright and Lending Software Position Statement
MLA's Position
The Medical Library Association (MLA) supports the position of the Copyright
Software Rental Amendments Act of 1990, which holds that libraries in
not-for-profit health sciences institutions may lend software for not-for-profit
purposes without securing the permission of the copyright owner as long
as a prescribed "warning of copyright" is affixed to the software
packaging. Health sciences librarians must understand the copyright law
and its amendments that directly relate to software and must promote the
rights of users under the law.
Why MLA Supports this Position
Health sciences librarians are charged with supporting the work of their
clients: practitioners, educators, students, and other professionals in
the biomedical sciences. As pioneers in the use of technological innovations,
health sciences institutions continue to enhance their libraries' collections
with computer software and other media. These resources have become necessary
components of health sciences education, patient care, and research. Sharing
software with users is consistent with the established library practice
of providing books, journals, and other resources directly to clients.
Just as librarians understand and recognize the copyright law's impact
on most library operations, they must also become conversant with copyright
law as it relates to computer software.
Basic Principles
- MLA acknowledges that a fundamental goal of the copyright law, including
amendments that apply to software, is to balance the rights of authors
with the rights of users.
- Because the use of biomedical software supports the educational,
research, and patient care activities of library users, MLA advocates
the rights of libraries to lend software.
- Because some vendors try through licensing agreements to prohibit
lending of software, MLA believes that health sciences librarians must
proactively advocate the rights of users.
Background
The foundation for the U.S. copyright law is the copyright phrase in the
U.S. Constitution, article 1, section 8, clause 8: "to promote the
progress of science and the useful arts, by securing for limited time
to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings
and discoveries." The copyright law and its subsequent amendments
and court decisions strive to balance the rights of authors and the rights
of users.
However, this balance becomes more complicated in the face of modern
technology. As with all new technologies, regulating computer software
has proven problematic and poses monumental challenges for both creators
and users. In recent years, however, copyright guidelines for software
have emerged. The Software Copyright Act of 1980 defined the term computer
program, authorized copyright protection, and provided fair-use guidelines
for owners of copies of copyrighted programs at Copyright Section 117.
This legislation gave libraries the right to make one archival copy of
a computer program and to reformat the program to make it compatible with
specific hardware but did not allow them to use unauthorized copies of
software or to make unauthorized copies for others.
The Computer Software Rental Amendments Act of 1990, amending Copyright
Act Section 109, granted the copyright owner of a computer program the
right to prohibit the resale, lending, or leasing of the program. However,
an exemption in this legislation allowed not-for-profit libraries and
not-for-profit educational institutions to lend software for not-for-profit
purposes without securing the permission of the copyright owner. To discourage
unauthorized copying, each software program must have a copyright warning
affixed to the package. The Computer Software Rental Amendments Act is
effective through October 1, 1997, but may be extended.
In 1994, the register of copyrights presented a report to Congress,
The Computer Software Rental Amendments Act of 1990: The Nonprofit
Library Lending Exemption to the Rental Right, on whether the library
exemption "has achieved its intended purpose of maintaining the integrity
of the copyright system while providing non-profit libraries the capability
to fulfill their function" [1]. The report was
based on comments from library and software associations, including MLA,
which responded to the Copyright Office's 1993 Notice of Inquiry requesting
feedback and information to help evaluate how the nonprofit lending provision
is working. Although the report assessed its own findings as inconclusive
and called for further study and analysis of software-lending patterns
by libraries, it raised several important issues regarding software licensing
agreements.
Most software is leased rather than sold: the user buys the right to
use the software, while the software publisher retains ownership. To control
the subsequent rental and potentially illegal copying of software, many
software producers have attempted to restrict software use through licensing
agreements in the form of a message that is shrink-wrapped with the software.
This "shrink-wrap contract" states that opening the package
constitutes agreement with the publishers' licensing arrangements, which
in many cases explicitly prohibit renting or lending the software.
MLA responded to this issue with the recommendation that libraries post
the copyright warning in the facility or at the computer where the software
is used. Following up on this recommendation, the report suggested that
in the absence of legislation, librarians post a clear warning on every
computer available for use by patrons. In the future, the U.S. Copyright
Office plans to work with copyright owners and librarians to develop standardized
language for this purpose. The report also suggested that computer log-in
screens show warnings when a program is loaded on the user's hard drive
and that copyright holders specify the rights and responsibilities of
licensees when copies of computer programs are lent or transferred under
license.
Do these restrictive licenses violate the Computer Software Rental Amendments
Act exemption that gives nonprofit libraries the legal right to circulate
software? The law explicitly protects the intellectual property rights
of the software publishers yet allows not-for-profit libraries to lend
software. Although librarians should encourage users to comply with copyright
law and license provisions, they must not forgo the legal rights of their
users in the process.
One suggestion that seeks to avoid ambiguous interpretations of the
licensing agreements is for purchase orders for computer software to include
a statement indicating that the software is for library clients' use and
is being purchased with the intent to circulate it. It may then be argued
that the supplier knew of the intent to circulate the software and agreed
to the library's conditions.
MLA continues to support the fundamental purpose of the copyright law,
and its members recognize their professional responsibility to observe
the law. Librarians should familiarize themselves with the copyright law
regarding computer software. MLA encourages libraries to continue to educate
users about the rights and responsibilities regarding copyright issues.
Copyright should not be an obstacle to education or access.
Conclusion
The rights of health sciences librarians to lend software to users in
not-for-profit institutions are guaranteed under the Computer Software
Rental Amendments Act of 1990. Because the information and knowledge contained
in software is often vitally important to library users, MLA supports
and advocates the right of nonprofit libraries to lend software. For further
information on this issue, please refer to The Copyright Law and the
Health Sciences Librarian, 1989 Revised Edition [2].
References
- U.S. Acting Register of Copyrights. The Computer Software Rental
Amendments Act of 1990: the nonprofit library lending exemption to the
"rental right." Washington, DC: the Register, March 1994.
- Medical Library Association. The copyright law and the health sciences
librarian. Rev. ed. Chicago: the Association, 1989.
Author
Prepared March 1995 by
Marianne Puckett, Associate Director, Louisiana State University
Medical Center Library, Shreveport
MLA Governmental Relations Committee